Korean Journal of Psychology : General

理쒓렐샇 寃깋

Korean Journal of Psychology : General - Vol. 39 , No. 3

[ Regular issue ]
The Korean Journal of Psychology: General - Vol. 39, No. 3, pp.359-383
ISSN: 1229-067X (Print)
Print publication date 25 Sep 2020
Received 11 Jul 2020 Accepted 16 Jul 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22257/kjp.2020.

한국형 다차원 성격검사(Bright and Dark Personality Inventory: BDPI)의 개발과 타당화: 일반 성격과 부적응 성격의 통합
김명기1) ; 이상준2) ; 한여울3) ; 박두진2), ; 최기홍3), †† ; 서동기1), †††
1)한림대학교 심리학과, 석사과정생 (kmk930830@naver.com)
2)피비씨지(Psychology based Consulting Group), 선임 연구원 (lsjpsyche@pbcgresearch.com)
3)고려대학교 심리학과, 석박사과정생 (olivebird352@korea.ac.kr)

Development and Validation of Bright and Dark Personality Inventory(BDPI): Integrating Bright and Dark Sides of Personality
Myeong Gi Kim1) ; Sang Jun Lee2) ; Yeoul Han3) ; Doo Jin Park2), ; Kee-Hong Choi3), †† ; Dong Gi Seo1), †††
1)Department of Psychology, Hallym University
2)PBCG(Psychology based Consulting Group)
3)Department of Psychology, Korea University
Correspondence to : 피비씨지(Psychology based Consulting Group), 대표, 서울 중구 장충단로 8길 12, E-mail: doopark@pbcgresearch.com
Correspondence to : ††서울 성북구 안암로 145 고려대학교 심리학과, 부교수, E-mail: kchoi1@korea.ac.kr
Correspondence to : †††강원도 춘천시 한림대학길1 한림대학교 심리학과 및 응용심리연구소, 조교수 Tel: 033-248-1727, E-mail: wmotive@hallym.ac.kr

Funding Information ▼


본 연구는 Lee 등(2019)이 실시한 한국형 다차원 성격검사(Bright and Dark Personality Inventory: BDPI)의 타당화 연구의 후속 연구이다. 총 3단계에 걸친 조사로 전국 성인 1059명의 데이터를 수집하고 분석을 실시하였다. BDPI 중 일반 성격특성을 측정하는 다섯 개의 요인과 부적응 위험특성을 측정하는 다섯 개의 요인간의 요인 간 상관을 확인한 결과, 일반성격요인과 부적응성격요인은 서로 독립적인 차원임을 확인할 수 있었다. 일반성격요인 및 부적응성격요인의 내적 일관성과 검사-재검사 신뢰도는 양호한 수준을 나타냈다. 일반성격요인과 부적응성격요인의 5요인 측정모형에 대한 확인적 요인분석 결과, 일반성격요인과 부적응성격요인은 수용 가능한 모형 합치도 지수를 보였다. Big Five Inventory(BFI) 및 Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Short Form(PID-5-SF)과의 준거 관련 타당도를 확인한 결과, 일반성격요인은 BFI와 적절하게 수렴 및 변별되는 것으로 나타났지만, 부적응성격요인은 PID-5-SF와 수렴되었으나 변별은 잘 되지 않았다. BDPI를 독립변수로, SAPAS-SR을 종속변수로 설정한 회귀분석에서 BDPI는 양호한 예측 타당도를 보였다. 마지막으로 본 연구의 제한점과 추후 연구내용을 논의에 제시하였다.


This study is a follow-up study of the Korean version of the Bright and Dark Personality Inventory (BDPI), which was studied by Lee et al. (2019). Data collected from The total of 1,059 adults was used for this study. The correlation between general personality factors, which measures general personality traits, and maladaptative personality factors, which measures dysfunctional personality adaptation were low, indicating that general personality and maladaptative personality were independent. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability of general personality and maladaptative personality were relatively high. The confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated the 5 factor measurement model of general personaltiy factors and maladaptative personality factors, respectively and provided acceptable goodness of fit indices. General personality was properly converged and discriminated with Big Five Inventory (BFI) and Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Short Form (PID-5-SF). Maladaptative personality was overall converged with PID-5-SF, however, it was not discriminated within PID-5 SF sub-factors. The prediction validity was confirmed by regression of BDPI factors on the SAPAS-SR. Finally, limitations and implications for future research are described.

Keywords: BDPI, multi-dimensional personality Inventory, general personality, maladaptative personality, scale development, validation
키워드: BDPI, 다차원 성격검사, 일반 성격, 부적응 성격, 척도 개발, 타당화


이 논문은 2018년도 정부(교육부)의 재원으로 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임(NRF- 2018S1A5A2A03030006).

1. Ahn, C. K., & Chae, J. H. (1997). Standardization of the Korean version of the revised NEO Personality Inventory. Korean Journal of Counseling and Psychology, 9(1), 443-472.
2. Allport, G. W., & Odbert, H. S. (1936). Trait-names: A psycho-lexical study. Psychological Monographs, 47, i-171.
3. American Psychiatric Association. (1980). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed.).
4. American Psychiatric Association. (1987). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed. revised).
5. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.).
6. American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text revision).
7. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.).
8. Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 16(3), 397-438.
9. Bach, B., Markon, K., Simonsen, E., & Krueger, R. F. (2015). Clinical utility of the DSM-5 alternative model of personality disorders: Six cases from practice. Journal of Psychiatric Practice, 21, 3-25. https://10.1097/01.pra.0000460618.02805.ef
10. Bandalos, D. L., & Finney, S. J. (2001). Item parceling issues in structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), New developments and techniques in structural equation modeling (pp. 269-296). LEA.
11. Browne, M. W. (1972). Oblique rotation to a partially specified target. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 25, 207-212.
12. Cattell, R. B. (1943). The description of personality: Basic traits resolved into clusters. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 38, 476-506.
13. Chatterjee, A., & Hambrick, D. C. (2011). Executive personality, capability cues, and risk taking: How narcissistic CEOs react to their successes and stumbles. Administrative Science Quarterly, 56(2), 202-237.
14. Choi, J. S., Hwang, S. J., Bae, D. H., Hwang, S. T., & Kim, Y. L. (2015). Diagnostic Efficiency of Personality Disorder Screening Tool; The Korean version of Self-Report Standardized Assessment of Personality-Abbreviated Scale: Preliminary validation study. Korean Neuropsychiatric Association, 54(4), 534-541.
15. Choi, K. H., Park, D. J., & Seo, D. G. (2018). Technical manual for Bright and Dark Personality Inventory (BDPI).
16. Clark, L. A. (2007). Assessment and diagnosis of personality disorder: Perennial issues and an emerging reconceptualization. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 227-257. https://10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190200
17. Cloninger, C. R. (2000). A practical way to diagnosis personality disorder: a proposal. Journal of Personality Disorders, 14(2), 99-108.
18. Cloninger, C. R., Przybeck, T. R., Svrakic, D. M., & Wetzel, R. D. (1994). The Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI): A guide to its development and use.
19. Costa Jr., P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Neo personality inventory-revised (NEO-PI-R).
20. English, T., & Chen, S. (2007). Culture and self-concept stability: Consistency across and within context among Asian Americans and European Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 478-490. https://10.1037/0022-3514.93.3.478
21. Ferguson, E., Semper, H., Yates, J., Fitzgerald, J. E., Skatova, A., & James, D. (2014). The ‘dark side’and ‘bright side’of personality: When too much conscientiousness and too little anxiety are detrimental with respect to the acquisition of medical knowledge and skill. PLoS One, 9(2).
22. Gleason, M. E., Weinstein, Y., Balsis, S., & Oltmanns, T. F. (2014). The enduring impact of maladaptive personality traits on relationship quality and health in later life. Journal of Personality, 82, 493-501.
23. Harkness, A. R., & McNulty, J. L. (1994). The Personality Psychopathology Five (PSY-5): Issues from the pages of a diagnostic manual instead of a dictionary. In S. Strack & M. Lorr (Eds.), Differentiating normal and abnormal personality (pp. 291-315).
24. Horn, J. L., & McArdle, J. J. (1992). A practical and theoretical guide to measurement invariance in aging research. Experimental aging research, 18(3), 117-144.
25. IBM Corp. (2017). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows [Computer software]. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
26. John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin & O.P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 102-138).
27. Judge, T. A., Heller, D., & Mount, M. K. (2002). Five-factor model of personality and job satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 530-541.
28. Jung, S., Lee, S. M., Lee, Y. S., & Lee, M. S. (2011). Development of a short form of the MMPI Scale 2 using full-information item factor analysis. Korean Journal of Psychology: General, 30(3), 811-830.
29. Kanagawa, C., Cross, S. E., & Markus, H. R. (2001). “Who am I?” The cultural psychology of the conceptual self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 90-103.
30. Kim, H. O., & Kim, S. J. (2015). Cultural differences in the stability of self-report measures: A comparison of Korean and German students. Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 29(3), 67-83.
31. Kim J. H., Kim, B. H, & Ha, M. S. (2011). Validation of a Korean version of the Big Five Inventory. Journal of Human Understanding and Counseling, 32(1), 47-65.
32. Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4rd ed.).
33. Krueger, R. F., & Tackett, J. L. (2003). Personality and psychopathology: Working toward the bigger picture. Journal of Personality Disorders, 17(2), 109-128.
34. Krueger, R. F., Derringer, J., Markon, K. E., Watson, D., & Skodol, A. E. (2012). Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM-5. Psychological Medicine, 42, 1879-1890.
35. Le, H., Oh, I. S., Robbins, S. B., Ilies, R., Holland, E., & Westrick, P. (2011). Too much of a good thing: Curvilinear relationships between personality traits and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(1), 113.
36. Lee, J. H., & Kim, S. Y. (2016). Item parceling: Understanding and applying the principles. Korean Journal of Psychology: General, 35(2), 327-353.
37. Lee, K. B., & Ashton, M. C. (2004). Psychometric properties of the HEXACO personality inventory. Multivariatebehavioral research, 39(2), 329-358.
38. Lee, K. I. (1994). The development Big Five structure in the personality. Student Guidance Center Busan National University, 29(1), 39-68.
39. Lee, K. I. (1995). The NEO-PI-R factor structure and maladaptive group profile Korean (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Busan National University, Busan Korea.
40. Lee, S. J., Han, Y. U., Kim, H. W., Lee, H. J., Park, J. Y., Choi, K. H., Park, D. J., Choi, J. W., Kim, M. K., Seo, D. G. (2019). Dvelopment and Validation of Multi-Dimensional Personality Inventory in Preliminary Study: Integrating Bright and Dark Sides of Personality. Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38(3), 318-334.
41. Lee, S. M., Youn, C. Y., Lee, M. H., & Jung, S. H. (2016). Exploratory Factor Analysis: How has it changed? Korean Journal of Psychology: General, 35(1), 217-255.
42. Little, T. D., Rhemtulla, M., Gibson, K., & Schoemann, A. M. (2013). Why the items versus parcels controversy needn’t be one. Psychological Methods, 18(3), 285-300.
43. MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 130-149.
44. Matsunaga, M. (2008). Item parceling in structural equation modeling: A primer. Communication Methods and Measures, 2(4), 260-293.
45. Maples, J. L., Carter, N. T., Few, L. R., Crego, C., Gore, W. L., Samuel, D. B., Williamson, R. L., Lynam, D. R., Widiger, T. A., Markon, K. E., Krueger R. F., & Miller, J. D. (2015). Testing whether the DSM-5 personality disorder trait model can be measured with a reduced set of items: An item response theory investigation of the personality inventory for DSM-5. Psychological Assessment, 27(4), 1195-1210.
46. McCrae, R. R., & John, O. P. (1992). An introduction to the five‐factor model and its applications. Journal of personality, 60(2), 175-215.
47. Meade, A. W., & Lautenschlager, G. J. (2004). A comparison of item response theory and confirmatory factor analytic methodologies for establishing measurement equivalence/invariance. Organizational Research Methods, 7(4), 361-388.
48. Min B. M., & Park, D. J. (2000). The five factor personality structure of Korean using NEO-PI-R. Paper presented at the annual conference of Korean Psychological Association, 2000(1), 118-119.
49. Morey, L. C. (1988). The categorical representation of personality disorder: A cluster analysis of DSM-III-R personality features. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 97, 314-321.
50. Morey, L. C., Skodol, A. E., & Oldham, J. M. (2014). Clinician judgments of clinical utility: A comparison of DSM-IV-TR personality disorders and the alternative model for DSM-5 personality disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 123(2), 398.
51. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998-2017). Mplus User's Guide. Eighth Edition.
52. Nestadt, G., Costa Jr, P. T., Hsu, F. C., Samuels, J., Bienvenu, O. J., & Eaton, W. W. (2008). The relationship between the five-factor model and latent Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, personality disorder dimensions. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 49(1), 98-105.
53. Ng, T. W., Eby, L. T., Sorensen, K. L., & Feldman, D. C. (2005). Predictors of objective and subjective career success: A meta analysis. Personnel psychology, 58(2), 367-408.
54. Oluf, G. A., & Furnham, A. (2015). The relationship between bright-and dark-side personality traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 87, 206-211.
55. Piedmont, R. L., Sherman, M. F., Sherman, N. C., Dy-Liacco, G. S., & Williams, J. E. (2009). Using the five-factor model to identify a new personality disorder domain: The case for experiential permeability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1245-1258.
56. Shin, S. Y., & Hwang, S. T. (2016). Reliability and Validity of the Korean version Personality Inventory for DSM-5(PID-5). Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 30(3), 1-24.
57. Smith, M. B., Hill, A. D., Wallace, J. C., Recendes, T., & Judge, T. A. (2018). Upsides to dark and downsides to bright personality: A multidomain review and future research agenda. Journal of Management, 44(1), 191-217.
58. Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and Collectivism.
59. Trull, T. J., & Durrett, C. A. (2005). Categorical and dimensional models of personality disorder. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 1, 355-380.
60. Yoo, T. Y., Lee, K. B., & Ashton, M. C. (2004). Psychometric properties of the Korean version of the HEXACO personality inventory. Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 18(3), 61-75.
61. Wales, W. J., Patel, P. C., & Lumpkin, G. T. (2013). In pursuit of greatness: CEO narcissism, entrepreneurial orientation, and firm performance variance. Journal of Management Studies, 50(6), 1041-1069.
62. Westen, D., & Shedler, J. (1999). Revising and assessing Axis II, Part I: Developing a clinically and empirically valid assessment method. American Journal of Psychiatry, 156(2), 258-272.
63. Whooley, M. A., Avins, A. L., Miranda, J., & Browner, W. S. (1997). Case‐finding instruments for depression: Two questions are as good as many. Journal of general internal medicine, 12(7), 439-445.
64. Widiger, T. A. (1997). Personality disorders as maladaptive variants of common personality traits: Implications for treatment. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 27(4), 265-282.
65. Widiger, T. A., & Simonsen, E. (2005). Alternative dimensional models of personality disorder: Finding a common ground. Journal of Personality Disorders, 19, 110-130.
66. Widiger, T. A., & Trull, T. J. (2007). Plate tectonics in the classification of personality disorder: Shifting to a dimensional model. American Psychologist, 62, 71-83.
67. Zachar, P., Krueger, R. F., & Kendler, K. S. (2016). Personality disorder in DSM-5: An oral history. Psychological Medicine, 46, 1-10.